What? You still stole the disk, just because if you couldn't pirate it you wouldn't buy it anyway doesn't mean you still didn't STEAL THE DISC.
Is it possible to download spore for free software#
We could also just say that "this is just the way it is" and just ignore that legitimate customers are getting a less than adequate treatment and people are downloading software without paying, but what good is that? But then again, there aren't many possibilities for change.
Is it possible to download spore for free free#
Making more laws or out date others will only create more problems, the problem is really more of a subjective one, where publishers and creators need to start finding ways to accommodate the customer rather than fighting the pirates and try to make up for lost money by ripping people off for would've-been free services. I don't see how laws have anything to do with stimulating the spread of culture? I don't think laws are the root of this problem. You would use the word "steal" or "theft" if you had to make a real life analogy to pirating, so whether or not the objective definition of the words are different, they are still theoretically the same.
Just because you export tracks from a CD to files on your computer doesn't mean the artist won't lose money when you send it to your peers online. As long as there is a monetary system, pirating is stealing.īesides, it's not like just because it's ones and zeros on a computer it's suddenly fine to "take" a product without paying the price it costs. If you look at it in a bigger picture: When downloading a product and violating copyrights, you're not paying for the product that a creator made, he will not receive money for his product, and he will thereby not be able to use the hypothetical property he would've bought with the money he should've gotten from the product you downloaded and did not pay for, so you are indirectly stealing. It easily collapse it to bickering about pirates are evil or publishers are evil without really addressing the issue. That is a big problem with this discussion. If we do not start to go in deep and analyze the problem (if there is one) the we can not really say anything about it. Or am i wrong in that the law should promote the spreed of culture, ideas and new innovations? If so then what is the point of the laws? If we still hold true to idea that we should stimulate the spreed of culture, ideas and new innovations then what kind of laws should we have? Should we keep the laws we have today or we change them? Is there a problem today? The idea of wearing black sneaker with a yellow tuxedo as a fashion statement can not. They must achieve a certain culture status to gain protection. No nation i know of has any form of state granted monopoly for simple ideas. But this probably is just a story.)īTW: You can not copyright ideas. (Some claims that Alexander Graham Bell bribed a patent clerks to get his patent though before Elisha Gray. This hardly ever happens though i have heard stories about patent clerks being bribed in to delaying or otherwise tapering with patents in the hope that someone else gets the exclusive right even though he is not entitled to it according to law. To steal a copyright or IP for that matter you need to take the monopoly form is owner. It may undermine the copyright it self but is not stealing. Now stealing is when you take the property of someone and thereby deprive them form using there property. By granting the creator the exclusive right for a limited time is the hope that it will stimulate the distribution of works of art. Normally is set for a limited time and gives the creator (and potential publishers) exclusive right to the reproduction of a work of art. A Copyright like i have said before is a State Granted Monopoly. Well first take the issue about why copyright infringement is not stealing.
I'm just really P'd off at the inane music that's currently being pushed in to the market constantly by greedy record labels, so I'm just ranting, sorry. Nobody outside of the gaming industry is really thinking outside the box or reinventing the wheel, but that's because the gaming industry is fairly new, it can't be long until every game will look the same, EA is making that industry head there fast. Publishers aren't interested in the product as such, they just want to market and sell it, that's why we're seeing an increasing number of uninspired boring entertainment products. Or creators should start publishing themselves. I'm just saying, if you really needed to do something about piracy, unfair publishers and compensating the creator, creators themselves protesting against their publishers would be the only "realistic" way of going about it, I believe. There is no model? You can't just change the entertainment industry. I didn't mean to mix up stealing and pirating, sorry, but in some way you are stealing the creators intellectual property.
0 kommentar(er)
